Page 66 - RESEARCH HANDBOOK FOR LL.M. AND PHD
P. 66

6. Cite primary sources.

                           In a legitimate legal discussion, even the least strict constructionists at least begin by examining
                           and  citing  the  relevant  law  itself.  Constitutional  clauses,  statutes,  regulations,  and  judicial
                           decisions  are  the  primary  building  blocks  of  legal  analysis;  everything  else  is,  literally,
                           commentary. You can’t write a good legal research paper based solely on citations to secondary
                           sources such as law review articles and textbooks.
                           You have to begin with the actual law. Then, you can argue about interpretation. Legal readers,
                           in the first instance, want to know what the law itself says, rather than what some law professor
                           has to say.
                                7. No gratuitous comments

                           Legal writing is not the place for gratuitous comments (e.g.,”We should not forget that...” or
                           ”Unfortunately, the court disagreed...”) or throwaway lines. Words are the attorney’s only tool,
                           so law students must learn to write as though every statement counts. In the same vein use of
                           rhetorical  questions  (e.g.,”Why,  you  might  ask...”)  should  be  minimized  in  legal  wilting,  in
                           favor  of  declarative  statements.  The  reader  wants  to  know  your  position  on  the  issues,  and
                           providing your position as an answer to a rhetorical question may strike many readers as a bit
                           condescending or patronizing.
                                 8. Keep the tone serious,

                           Legal  writing  does  not  have  to  be  somber  and  boring-  Indeed,  it  ought  to  be  creative  and
                           interesting. Creativity and provocation must take place, however, within a serious tone. Certain
                           techniques  that  may  fit  well  into  certain  other  forms  of  writing  (e.g.,humor,  rhetorical
                           questions, a ”whiz bang!!” feel) detract from the purpose of a legal research paper, which is to
                           persuade  the  reader  to  agree  with—and  ultimately  to  act  upon—your  argument.  The  worst
                           criticism  that  can  be  leveled  against  an  attorney  is  ”He/she  is  dishonest,”  but  the  next  most
                           devastating is ”He/she’s a joke.” An attorney is of little value to the client if others won’t take
                           the attorney seriously, and law students should learn how to begin to earn that respect through
                           their writing style.







                                                                                       Research Hand Book |  55
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71