Page 65 - RESEARCH HANDBOOK FOR LL.M. AND PHD
P. 65

3. Avoid the "obvious.”

                            Unless you are making a really unassailable proposition, such as ”The earth revolves around
                            the  sun,”  using  terms  such  as  ”obviously,”  ”clearly,”  ”of  course,”  ”unarguable”  ”simply,”
                            ”certainly,” and ”well known” raise enormous red flags for the reader. If you have authority
                            for a proposition, cite it. If you don’t have any authority, perhaps the proposition is not as
                            ”obvious” as you thought.
                            Besides, if your point is really that “obvious” to everyone, why waste time and space restating
                            it? And, how can you be so sure that another lawyer won’t come along and disagree with the
                            proposition that you thought was so ”clear”?
                            Similarly, terms such as ”many,” ”several,” ”numerous,” ”some,” and “widely held” raise flags
                            unless there is citation to examples. Think about how you would respond to a reader who sees
                            such a term used, questions your accuracy, and demands, “Name one!” If you cannot, your
                            bluff has been successfully called.

                               4. Don’t apologize for your positions.

                            You  rarely  need  to  preface  your  statements  with  introductory  quasi-apologies  or  such
                            equivocations as ”In my opinion,” ”I think,” ”I believe,” or ”I feel.”
                            First,  the  reader  of  legal  writing  really  doesn’t  care  what  the  author  ”thinks,”  ”believes,  or
                            ”feels.” In this genre, the only things that matter are what you can prove or logically support
                            through reasoned analysis and argument.
                            Second,  the  reader  automatically  assumes  that  any  proposition  for  which  you  do  not  cite
                            authority  must  be  your  own  opinion,  so  there  is  no  need  for  the  reminder.  Just  make  your
                            points and let them be evaluated for what they’re worth.
                                5. Any particular law in mind?

                            Avoid  making  broad  statements  such  as  “doing  X  is  illegal”  unless  you  can  explain  which
                            specific  statute,  regulation,  or  common  raw  rule  is  being  violated,  and  why.  Be  especially
                            cautious about making the claim that ”doing X is unconstitutional” unless you can back up
                            that claim with one or more constitutional clause(s).









        54 | National Law University, Delhi
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70